Source: www.kindlefiretab.com --- Sunday, July 14, 2013
Tweet On Sunday?s ?Meet the Press,? Idaho Republican Rep. Raul Labrador and New York Times columnist David Brooks got into a tense back-and-forth over Republican opposition to the immigration reform bill that the Senate passed last month. According to Brooks, GOP opposition was intellectually weak if one took into account the Congressional Budget Office?s calculations. ?You know, I?ve seen a lot of intellectually weak cases in this town,? Brooks said. ?I?ve rarely seen as intellectually a weak case as the case against the Senate immigration bill. The Republicans say they want to reduce illegal immigration. The Congressional Budget Office says the Senate bill will reduce it by a third to half. They say they want economic growth. All the top conservative economists say it?ll produce economic growth. They say they want to reduce the debt. The CBO says it will reduce the debt. All the big major objectives the Republicans stand for, the Senate immigration bill will do. And so, the other things they?re talking about are secondary and tertiary issues. Whether we get 86 percent border protection or 90 percent ? compared to the big things this bill does, they?re miniscule.? Labrador responded to Brooks? criticisms, pointing out that the Senate?s bill with its weaker border security mechanisms meant illegal immigration would still pose a problem. ?I?m sorry, what I just heard was totally ridiculous,? Labrador said. ?If you listen to what t ...
iCarly banana republic gap Victoria Secret Bath And Body Works Dicks Sporting Good office max
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন